Ask John: Could Yuri Become More Popular Than Yaoi in America?
|Question:
Do you think that yuri will become more popular than yaoi in America (especially with Media Blasters and Seven Seas releasing it)?
Answer:
Given your question, I’ll presume that you know that “yuri” is the Japanese term for manga and anime dealing with female homosexuality, and “yaoi” is the term for the literary theme of male homosexuality. While yuri and yaoi may be very similar concepts, their relative popularity is very different. There is a slowly growing amount of yuri themed material available in America, but I doubt that yuri will ever rival the success of yaoi in America or Japan.
Yaoi is tremendously popular within Japan’s anime, and especially its manga fan community. Not only are there stores exclusively devoted to yaoi material in Tokyo, the “Otome Road” area of Tokyo’s Ikebukuro district is famous for its concentration of businesses specializing in serving the yaoi and bishonen fan community. Yuri manga and anime are far from rare, but Japan doesn’t have stores that specialize in yuri material, nor a fan community for yuri large enough to support a localized congregation of specialty stores and restaurants. Within Japan’s manga fan community, yaoi constitutes a significant minority. Yuri represents a tiny niche.
Similarly, American publishers including Media Blasters and Seven Seas have dipped their toes into yuri material with releases like Simoun, Strawberry Panic, and The Last Uniform. Nozomi Entertainment is poised to venture into the genre with its forthcoming domestic release of “Maria Watches Over Us” (Maria-sama ga Miteru). And ALC Press has spent years diligently bringing Japanese and international lesbian themed comics to American readers. But these inroads are small and obscure compared to the tremendous American success of Media Blasters’ yaoi line, and the output of domestic publishing lines including 801 Press, Yaoi Press, Drama Queen, June, and Be Beautiful.
The reason for the disparity between the success of yaoi and that of yuri lies in their audience. Yaoi is successful because it’s largely created by, targeted at, and appeals to females. There’s also a smaller male audience for yaoi. However, yuri themed material is not consistently created by female artists, nor is it consistently targeted at female consumers. Yaoi has a tremendous audience of devoted female consumers, but yuri material doesn’t have a massive, devoted fan following. Yuri themed works like Maria-sama ga Miteru are targeted primarily at female audiences, but titles including Kannazuki no Miko, the Strawberry Panic anime, and Simoun are oriented toward male viewers.
Countless female manga and anime fans adore the taboo sensuality and baroque romanticism of yaoi, but yuri themes don’t have a similar singular tone or even a singular goal – Maria-sama ga Miteru, for example, leans toward romantic drama for female viewers to sympathize with while Kannazuki no Miko uses its yuri content to entice male viewers with sensationalistic and exploitive themes. In effect, not only is the audience for yuri in both America and Japan smaller than the audience for yaoi; it’s also splintered. Yuri themes don’t consistently appeal to a large female audience, nor do they appeal to a large male audience. As a result, despite the admirable efforts of domestic proponents like ALC Press, yuri themed material probably has very little chance of ever becoming more than a tiny niche commodity in Japan and America.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The sad fact about yuri is most people immediately assume that all yuri is pornographic, and those who don’t appreciate pornographic stories immediately turn up their nose and write off the entire genre based on an erroneous assumption.
Actually, your article shows quite a big problem of yuri as a whole: The confusion who it is actually targetted at.
The anime of Marimite, for example, was aimed at men primarily. The same goes for Strawberry Panic(this one is the only one you identify correctly, probably by accident). This is because the “sisterhood”-like yuri is very popular among male yuri fans, who generally frown upon yuri that is lasting. The novels of Marimite, thus the original works, were not even intended as yuri. It just had a (failed) yuri side couple.
Kannazuki no Miko and Simoun both, however, were not aimed primarily at men. Both were explicitely aimed at both genders. This is extremely evident in the case of Kannazuki, which even mentiones boy love and introduced tremendous male/male subtext for three characters. Simoun does the same, albeit indirectly, and also ends up with a m/m couple.
On top of it, Kannazuki is written like a yaoi show, just with female main characters. Many of its commercials were also aimed at female fans.
In all four cases, we know the target audience of the shows because the directors stated them themselves. But as we see in your judgement of the shows: Many people, especially out of japan, get completely confused here, and mislabel animes almost entirely. Something like Kannazuki – which has a primarily female following – suddenly is just exploitive stuff for guys, while Marimite – which has a HUGE amount of male fans – is suddenly romantic drama for women(which misunderstands the anime a lot, by the way, as most of the drama is not intended to be romantic).
This is a problem, because companies will also get confused, and misaim animes. This is prone to diminish their success a great deal.