Ask John: What H Manga Genres Haven’t Hit America?
|Question:
What are some of the more overlooked subgenres of ero manga not picked up by domestic publishers?
Answer:
To be honest, I’m slightly hesitant to address this question because I don’t see a lot of positive value in focusing the attention of Americans onto aspects of manga and anime culture that Americans may find unsavory or offensive. However, at the same time, the purpose of “Ask John” is to encourage understanding and appreciation of Japanese pop art. So pretending that certain varieties of manga don’t exist contradicts my principles and does no service to international manga fans that want to know more about manga. There are a variety of erotic manga sub-genres that aren’t widely available in America. Most of them remain excluded from official American release because they’re either banned in America, or they skate dangerously close to illegality in America. All of these subgenres are legal and accepted varieties of manga in Japan, where they’re classified as legally protected artistic expression.
The best known type of erotic manga common in Japan but not commercially distributed in America is “lolicon,” named after the Japanese abbreviation for “Lolita Complex.” As its name suggests, lolicon manga focus on the sexual fetishization of young girls. Countless male and female manga artists routinely publish lolicon comics. Commercially distributed monthly manga magazines including Comic LO and Comic Rin exclusively publish lolicon serials.
Typical lolicon manga depicts preadolescent girls in sexual situations, but there is a further, small sub-genre of lolicon material. Less common, but still present is lolicon manga that places infants and very young girls in sexual situations. Serial anthologies like Comic Angel (not to be confused with the monthly Angel Club magazine) feature this variety of lolicon that the English speaking adult manga fan community referrs to as “toddlercon.” I don’t know if Japan’s manga community has a specific genre term for this sub-division of lolicon.
The male equivalent of lolicon is “shotacon,” divided into “straight” and yaoi shotacon. “Straight shota” involves underage boys engaged in sex with female partners either of similar age, or older women. Wolf Ogami’s “Super Taboo,” published in America by Eros Comics arguably represents “straight shota.” Yaoi shota depicts underage boys engaged in sex with other male partners, either their own age, or adult men.
Shotacon also has a parallel genre known as “jousou.” The theme of the jousou manga genre involves boys dressing and acting like girls, or the feminization of young boys. Jousou seems to frequently involve dominant girls encouraging or forcing timid boys to adopt female characteristics, but examples like the “My Pico” anime series present jousou in which the young boys naturally and willfully adopt a feminine appearance and personality.
America does not have any federal laws prohibiting bestiality, although depictions of sex with animals are certainly subject to federal obscenity law. At least 30 of the 50 united states have formal laws dealing with bestiality, which practically eliminates the possibility of commercial American publication of adult manga like Yantaro Keno’s “Oh! My Dog” and the Kemono for Essential anthology series. On a side note, I guess demonic tentacles aren’t considered “animals” as there doesn’t seem to be any significant legal obstacle to the distribution of “inju” manga or anime in America.
The one major variety of adult manga not widely distributed in America that isn’t excluded from American distribution for legal considerations is the variety known as “ero gekiga shi,” or “erotic realistic comics.” Toshio Maeda’s Inju Gakuen (La Blue Girl) and Yoju Kyoushitsu Gakuen (Demon Beast Invasion) may be the closest American commercial release adult manga has come to the genre of Japanese erotic manga created primarily for mainstream adult Japanese men. Ero gekiga manga are typified by an artistic design style that bears more in common with traditional Japanese shunga art than the highly stylized, anime influence erotic manga typically found in magazines like Tenma, Megastore, and Mujin. Japanese ero gekiga manga uses a highly realistic design style similar to European adult comic artists like Milo Manara and Guido Crepax. Because this particular drawing style is so different from the more anime influenced style of adult manga for young men, the ero gekiga genre has never been popular in America.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The issue around the legality of the “lolicon” manga is worrisome to me, not just because of the very young age of the characters depicted but of the laws which would be enforced against them. Laws against child pornography do not differentiate between various ages of minors. Whether the image depicted is an 12-year-old or a 17-year-old doesn’t make a legal difference. Violations would be prosecuted under the same law (unless we are talking about obscenity charges which have little or no true legal guidelines). Sexual depictions of high school aged teenagers are not at all uncommon in anime and manga in either normal or adult material.
I am concerned about what legal action could be taken against anime fans with any material depicting high school students (Take on Me [Domin-8 Me in U.S.] or standard titles like End of Evangelion, Please Teacher, Revolutionary Girl Utena, and His & Her Circumstances) in graphic or even strongly provocative sexual situations. Some companies have actively tried to mislead or lie to the consumer about the ages of fictional characters depicted in their products. Claims that characters where uniforms because their ‘universities’ require them or that even the ‘younger’ sister characters are 18 always seemed ludicrous to me, but I hope they don’t prove to be necessary.
>Shotacon also has a parallel genre known as “jousou.â€
You mean 女装(joso)?
It will be a long, long time until even the mere importation of adult comics ceases to raise the ire of federal prosecutors… as evidenced by the Chistopher Handley [and/or the Dwight Edwin Whorley] case(s), which if not handled delicately, will absolutely destroy any otaku’s hopes of a budding possibility of further hentai distribution in the United States.
It’s crazy to think that we’re on the brink of a court ruling that just might determine that any character that “looks” young or underage in a mature situation constitutes as obscene… but that’s the type of country we live in. Takashi Murakami can have an art exhibit where he shows life-sized sculptures of an H-anime female with an array of swirling milk jettisoning from her breasts, but some guy in Iowa can’t read a paperback because his box was the unlucky box that a customs agent happened to have stumbled upon. Yay.
@kampfer
What bothers me about the legal ramifications of lolicon is that most lawmakers in the US want to legislate against it based on intent: someone with a large collection of lolicon images is just a child molester waiting to happen.
This is hardly the case. Studies in Japan have shown that lolicon has actually decreased instances of child molestation.
Pretty much every lolicon fan I’ve encountered on the net and in person has no problem with differentiating between reality and fantasy. There is a clear delineation between the fantasy of lolicon and real child pornography. Your average loli fan would never even contemplate harming a real child in any way, even if deep down they truly have that desire. In fact, just about every loli board I’ve seen immediately bans anyone who posts realistic/3D/CGI lolicon images due to these types of images going more towards the realm of realism than to fantasy. To the average loli fan, the image of a realistic child in those types of situations is unsettling to them. In fact, the entire Japanese loli community constantly reminds the fans to “look, not touch.”
However, lawmakers in this country assume all lolicon creates molesters, and so they try to enact legislation against the entire loli community to penalize everyone for the sake of a few maladjusted individuals. Lawmakers will never get it through their skulls that legislating against something people want will only make the problem worse.