Ask John: Why Do American Otaku Hate Filler Episodes?
|Question:
Why does it seem like there’s a lot of disgust in the otaku community over what are referred to as “filler episodes” in anime?
Answer:
“Filler” episodes, or what Japanese fans refer to as “original” episodes, pose a bit of an odd, ironic, but nevertheless valid problem. Anime television series are often based on pre-existing manga, yet sometimes anime adaptations vary from literally adapting the original source material by including new, anime-exclusive episodes. American fans frequently refer to these “original” episodes as “filler” because the episodes are often created specifically to span a period of one or more weeks to allow the original manga creator time to write more story. It’s easy to envision the duration of an anime TV series as a line that rises and falls. The peaks in the line represent the episodes that literally adapt the popular and familiar story from the original manga. The spans in-between those peaks have to be “filled in” with episodes entirely written by the animation staff instead of the original series creator.
Ironically viewers that watch typical episodic American cartoons don’t mind episodes that don’t align with an ongoing narrative. American comic book fans typically don’t complain very much about transitional and interim issues or installments in ongoing comic book series. Even Japanese otaku typically don’t take offense to “original” anime episodes with the vehemence that American otaku typically do. Japanese fans that become deeply engrossed in an ongoing anime series have the inexpensive, immediate, and convenient option to refer to the original manga series to skip over “filler” episodes and see what happens next. Traditionally American fans that have become deeply engrossed in an ongoing anime series only to suddenly encounter irrelevant episodes frequently with a subtle but noticeable difference in “feel,” have not had an alternative to simple disappointment and frustration over having their satisfaction prolonged. Fans engrossed in a favorite story want to see that story unfold. Tangential “filler” episodes are a supplemental distraction to the core narrative, thus they’re not as satisfying because they don’t provide the ongoing narrative that viewers want. Typical “filler” episodes don’t look any different from “canon” episodes because they’re all animated by the same studios & staff. However, “filler” episodes often “feel” a bit different because the filler episode plots are not created by the original series creator, and “filler” episode stories have to be considerate not to introduce any major developments that could have a ripple impact upon the primary narrative.
Partly because Japanese viewers have such each access to the original source manga to refer to, and partly because Japanese viewers are used to the conventions and necessities of professional anime production, typical Japanese viewers don’t seem to get as incensed over “filler” anime episodes as American viewers do. American viewers who are typically impressed by and enthused with the integrity, narrative quality, and production design of Japanese animation tend to unconsciously form high expectations, so they take great offense when those expectations go unfulfilled. American viewers are less familiar with the production necessities that affect anime studios, and less familiar with the traditions of long-running anime based on manga, so we’re less likely to be forgiving and accepting of “filler” episodes that don’t advance the narrative we want to see and don’t quite maintain the high level of narrative quality that we’ve become accustomed to.
The American rejection of “filler” episodes seems to be at a wane presently for two reasons. Americans have greater access to manga today than ever before. So like Japanese viewers, impatient American otaku that can’t wait to see what happens next can refer to the original manga. Furthermore, there are relatively few long-running shounen adventure anime on the air right now, allowing for fewer opportunities for filler episodes to air. Presently One Piece, Naruto Shippuden, Toriko, and Hunter x Hunter are the only ongoing shounen adventure anime, and I don’t think that Hunter x Hunter has included any anime original episodes yet. So recently there have been fewer “filler” episodes for American fans to rail against.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I think it’s also worth mentioning the difference between a filler episode here and there, and whole filler arcs spanning multiple episodes.
Personally, I think well done filler can be interesting. If the episode highlights previously hinted upon traits of the characters, or expands a little known locale in a supported, canon fashion, then these efforts could be pretty cool.
Of course, I doubt many people would say this was the norm.
Filler arcs, I feel, are just terrible because not only do they not progress the main storyline that I’m interested in, they can’t make permanent changes to characters. The narrative of the story can make all sort of strange gyrations during the filler, but has to make a perfect landing to join with the actual canon material it’s designed to be contiguous with. That means no changes to places that matter in canon, no changes to the meta story or background of the story, and no changes to the characters not unique to the arc.
My favorite example of a terrible filler arc is the “Bount” story in the Bleach anime. It came after the climax of a long, involved rescue story where an immense amount of background information was finally made clear, and then did…nothing. The new characters didn’t matter, because they weren’t in the manga at all. Canon, fan-invested individuals couldn’t continue to mature or grow. Watching it was an exercise in patience. The shift in tone back to the actual story was jarring and palpable after 26 episodes of ungrounded story.
milkman: Say what you will about the Bount angle but unlike some other arcs, Pierrot waited until Soul Society ended to make those fillers. The worst filler arcs were crammed right into Mexico a.k.a. Namek 3.0 a.k.a. Hueco Mundo. Zanpaktou was the worst of the worst and I promise everybody or else I will go in the goddamn grave, you will never see that piece of shit again!
I have to admit I agree with the question asker here I’ve never understood the almost seemingly unabashed hatred towards filler episodes and filler arcs. Personally in my opinion I think that filler arcs are just as good or even better than the main story arc. Whether it was the “Doom Tree Arc” from Sailor Moon. the “Garlic Jr Saga” from Dragon Ball Z, or the Bount, New Captain Amagai, or the Zanpaktou Rebellion Arcs from Bleach I thought they were all great and to this day I have nor will I ever understand the hate for them. In fact it was the Bount arc that got me into Bleach to start with. I just went back from there. But, then again maybe my brain is wired differently than most of my fellow American Otaku, since after all I have watched Endless 8 three times now and I find myself enjoying it more and more each time.