In Defense of The Last Jedi
|Star Wars: The Last Jedi spoilers follow.
I’ve been thinking a bit about Luke in Last Jedi. Contrary to the seeming predominant perspective, I still do like Luke’s story arc in the film (as well as most of the film). The standard criticism appears to be based in outrage over the possibility that Luke would ever succumb to murderous impulse, if even temporarily, and that he would subsequently become so jaded and dejected. But Luke’s response is actually completely logical and appropriate to his personality, and Yoda even points it out. Luke has always been emotionally impetuous, leading to errors in judgement. When Ben Kenobi died, Luke couldn’t contain his emotions and drew the attention of the stormtroopers. In Empire Luke takes his lightsaber into the Force cave even after Yoda warns him not to. Then Luke chooses to leave Dagobah for Bespin even after Yoda warns him that he’s not fit for the challenge. Even in Return of the Jedi Luke allows the Emperor’s provocation to tempt him. Then Luke again turns enraged and avenges himself on Vader after being provoked by an implied threat against his sister. So not only does Luke have a history of allowing his emotions to control his actions, Yoda in Last Jedi specifically scolds Luke for always having his head in the stars instead of being more grounded and responsible. I’m completely convinced that the Yoda scene in Last Jedi is one of the most important and pivotal moments in all of Star Wars because in contrast to commonplace fan assumption that Luke became a responsible, dependable Jedi Knight following the destruction of the second Death Star, the Yoda ghost scene in Last Jedi proves that Luke never truly grew up and overcame his impulsiveness until he heard Yoda’s final lesson. After that point is when Luke, now truly a Jedi Master, visits Crait to face responsibility for, not redeem, Kylo Ren.
Furthermore, the argument that Luke Skywalker would never turn jaded and withdrawn and cloister himself away also doesn’t hold water with me. During his recovery from the wampa attack, Luke was sullen. During the victory celebration on Endor, Luke detached himself from his companions. Moreover, Yoda, who was the assertive leader of the Jedi Council and an aggressive warrior, who instigated duels against both Count Dooku & Darth Sidious, exiled himself to the remote planet Dagobah following the Clone Wars and the execution of the Jedi. His personality also changed from being emphatic to being distracted, jaded, and nearly senile. So Luke Skywalker’s personality in The Last Jedi absolutely has prior precedent. Yoda exiled himself and became a grumpy old man after the Jedi he was responsible for were executed. Luke behaves exactly the same way.
And if I’m being provocative, I’ll go one step further. The common assumption is that Luke died at the end of the film, abandoning his corporeal form to join the Force. However, the film previously demonstrated that teleporting matter with the Force is possible. Droplets of water transferred across space from Rey on Ahch-To to Kylo Ren on Snoke’s star destroyer. So viewers can’t entirely dismiss the possibility that Luke Skywalker actually bodily teleported himself off Ahch-To at the end of The Last Jedi so that he may re-appear alive and well in the forthcoming Episode IX.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
While I think The Last Jedi was not a bad film it did strike me as an Empire Strikes Back rehash carrying the same dark tone and themes of Empire such as not placing your heroes on pedestals. I did like how Rey was portrayed as a more flawed character who was looking for a father figure it was definitely an interesting angle. My problem with the film is that it was extremely anti-clamatic and built up certain characters only to drop the ball. The Force Awakens built up Snoke as the big bad to rival Empeor Palpatine in both ruthlessness and power only to be killed halfway through the movie. Captain Phasma suffered the same fate as Maul an interesting character who died too quickly.
My problem with Luke was simply because he was too out of character. Lucas had written Luke as an idealistic character who wouldn’t give up in the face of adversity. So much so that he was the only one who believed in his father even after the horrible transgressions he committed. So why was that just thrown out the window? Why would he give up so easily? Why wouldn’t he try to talk to Ben before trying to assassinate him? I’d understand if it was shown that Luke made a genuine effort to reach Ben beforehand but we see so little of their relationship that it just make feel little sympathy for either character. If the movie focused on the main plot instead of shoehorning a nonsensical side plot it would’ve been much better.
I disagree that Luke hadn’t mastered his emotions. While it’s true he was prone to emotional outbursts Return of the Jedi showed how his character came full circle. Unlike his father he didn’t succumb to the influence of the devil and threw his sword away disproving Yoda’s assertion that he would turn to the dark side. A man who was able to bring hope to the galaxy and defeat the devil isn’t someone who would regress after that. After all, temptation only works if one can’t master their emotions. Luke is the kind of person who’d be on the frontlines not living as a hermit. On a side note, Yoda went into exile out of necessity as the whole Empire was gunning for his head. Something Luke didn’t have to do.
Also, while Rey was shown to be a flawed character we still have no understanding of her backstory. Since Force Awakens I was curious about how she had such acumen with the Force. The movie had the chance to put the medicholrians in proper context. But there is no payoff, Rey is proficient with the Force cause reasons. Then the movie conveys that anyone can become a Jedi which spits in the face of the established lore.
Finally, given the proper context of that scene it’s a strong indication that Luke was dead.